Reading passage discusses about the painting Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet which is misattributated to Rembrandt. The lecturer presents the recent findings that refutes these claims.
Firstly, the the passage states that the painter does not have attention to details since the dressup of the lady in painting is mismached and Rembrandts is known for his attention to details. lecturer mentions about the x-ray results of the painting which shows that that the cap was not at all the part of the original painting. In addtion to that she says that paining has been repainted to increse the value and importance.
Secondly, the painting have some issues wiith lighting and shawdows. Lecturer explaines this by saying that the colour of the fur was not dark in the original painting rather it was of light coloured cloth and unlike dark colour it would have reflected the light from fur.
Lastly, Passage says that Rembrandt has never used glued wooden panel for the paintings. The lecturer argues that the painting has been enlarged by someone in later time to increase the value for painting. Moreover, she asserts that the wood used to enlarge the painting was the same wood that Rembeandt had used in his earlier paintings. Indeed, acording to the researchers, the painting is drawn by Rembrandt.
To summerize this, lecturer gives various explainations for the questions being raised on the attribution of painting to Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... that refutes these claims. Firstly, the the passage states that the painter does no...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... that refutes these claims. Firstly, the the passage states that the painter does no...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lecturer
... is known for his attention to details. lecturer mentions about the x-ray results of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...ray results of the painting which shows that that the cap was not at all the part of the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1129707113 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60229519216 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52719665272 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8669615075 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.833333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255056385579 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101210737327 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754946326523 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148564044737 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458871437188 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.