The reading and the listening are both about R.Robustus which is not an active hunter rather scavenger. The author of the reading believes that there are 3 possible explanations regarding the issue of hunting. The Lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. She is of the opinion that R.robustus is an agile/vigorous hunter.
First of all, the author suggests that the size of r.robustus was similar to a cat which was way more smaller than the psittacosaurs. It is mentioned that due to this size difference the mammal(r.robustus) is would have been unable to successfully devour dinosaurs. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that the remains which were found could be a residue of a baby dinosaur. Furthermore, she argues that R.robustus mass could be more than twice of its hunted animals which is a condition of preying.
Secondly, the writer contends that the leg size and oddity of position indicates its inability to chase after prey. The article notes that the dinosaur found on the stomach was too fast to capture. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that Tasmanian devil, which size and leg position are almost analogous to r.robustus.She elaborates on this by mentioning that it’s average running speed is up to 15km/h and which is quite fast.
Finally, it is stated in the article that while hunting and eating an animal by another animal, normally there exist teeth marks on the bones of the hunted animals. The author establishes that the bones which were found on the stomach don’t have any teeth mark on it and the founded animal on the stomach could be a small psittacosaur, came from an unguarded egg. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that it could use powerful jaws for grabbing and holding an animal. She puts forth the idea that there is no evidence of back teeth of r.robustus, hence it could swallow an entire animal or into big pieces.
in conclusion, the lecturer effectively challenges the issues made by the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Robustus
...ding and the listening are both about R.Robustus which is not an active hunter rather sc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smaller' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smaller
...stus was similar to a cat which was way more smaller than the psittacosaurs. It is mentioned...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...tion are almost analogous to r.robustus.She elaborates on this by mentioning that i...
^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;s average running speed is up to 15km/h and which is quite fast. Finally, it ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...an entire animal or into big pieces. in conclusion, the lecturer effectively ch...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, while, as to, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9762611276 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77440295675 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522255192878 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5232825153 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6470588235 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269565461512 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885514286582 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111840911193 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139055258921 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110587948387 0.0443174109184 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.