research conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their work
the article states that work should be carried out through the group as a team and provides reasons for supports. however, the professor explains that and refutes each of the author's reasons.
first, the reading claims that the members in a group possess different skills, expertise, and knowledge that can form a great source to solve the problems and issues that would be assigned. The professor opposes this point by saying that some of the members in the group worked free ride whereas the team achieved good respects the whole group will / would be admiring and no matter some of the members have/had paramount influence in this triumph than the other members who no have/had a dramatic influence.
Second, the article posits that working as a team can help to work more quickly. in contrast, the professor says the project would not make quickly in this case. In fact, the members should have been meeting in succession / several times/ it takes time to have several meeting until they reach a consensus and the work go ahead with alone/ to move things alone.
Third, the reading says that some members of the team should/ may be presented creative solutions for figure problems out. The professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that some influencers in the group convinced the other member whether to implement the best idea or not, instead of making an argument about that idea. Even though some members do not agree with them and their disagreement would be ignored by others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the article states that work should be carr...
^^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...team and provides reasons for supports. however, the professor explains that and refute...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...d refutes each of the authors reasons. first, the reading claims that the members in...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...essor opposes this point by saying that some of the members in the group worked free ride w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... will / would be admiring and no matter some of the members have/had paramount influence in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a no'.
Suggestion: who is a no
... in this triumph than the other members who no have/had a dramatic influence. Second,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s a team can help to work more quickly. in contrast, the professor says the projec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, whereas, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89763779528 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3322111792 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570866141732 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2991251631 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101693368233 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431741530071 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376958890164 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067515465103 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014340330739 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.