salinity lake
Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses salt level increases in Salton Sea, which encounters high evaporation rate without enough replacement from other water sources. The author states that there are several viable mechanisms regarding resisting against the noticeable increases which are dangerous to living organisms there. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the writer says that this problem can be solved by an extraction process in which salt is separated from water and the pure water will be return to the sea. However, the speaker explains that the remained salt will be counted as threaten to human beings' life, owing to the fact that it contains harmful chemical substances like Selenium; if this dangerous component releases to the air, people would not be able to breath correctly.
Second, the author proclaims that mixing the Pacific Ocean water with the water in Salton Sea can easily decrease the salt level by piping and canal systems, because of being lower salty. Yet again, the lecturer underscores that never do local government have enough budget for constructing the mentioned transporting system; distance between these two locations, approximately a hundred kilometeres, is long enough to require much allocated money.
The final point of contention between the reading and the listening passage is dividing the Sea by several constructed walls. The writer thinks that by this method the whole sea will be divided into three parts, and the main and largest parts will be controlled and prohibited from any salt level increase. On the other hand, the speaker explains that this strategy will be useful in short-term horizons; many natural disasters like eqrthquakes can easily break the walls and the separated water will be mixed again with the other regions. Thus, separating walls cannot be practical in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-21 | saeedpanahi | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 14 80
- The passage discusses a painting which is said that is a painting of a well know artist Jane Austen and provides some reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor provides his own reasons and explains why he is against all claims in the 78
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 76
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...lt will be counted as threaten to human beings life, owing to the fact that it contain...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, as to, in short, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29449838188 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55350675115 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5634195529 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.727272727 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.