The article and the lecture are contradicting each other, in terms of sending spacecraft to Mars. More specifically, the penman of the article provides three theories to prove that it is less likely to possible to send spacecraft to Mars due to problems that scientists will face while going to Mars. However, the lecturer negated the arguments presented in the passage and provide some evidence to refute them.
According to the artice, the first dispute focuses on that fact that it is fact that round trip to Mars would take around two years. In such a scenario, the cargo of spacecraft does not have capacity to take a load of food,water and other essentials. Nonetheless, the speaker refutes this by stating that scientists could easily resolve the problem which has mentioned above. They can utilise hydroponics technique in order to grow plants in spcacraft which could fulfill their food requirements. What is more, as all know that plants have capacity to absorb carbon dioxide and throw our fresh oxygen, and thereby, people in the craft would get fresh air. Not only this but also the craft can provide them a fresh water by recycling the waste products.
Moreover, another point of debate highlights that in reality, staying in zero-gravity atmoshpere for two long years might lead to reduce mucles mass and can cause severe bone damage in the body. neverthless, the lecture refuts this by asserting facing a zero-gravity is not new for scientist since they have face similar issues earlier too and they do know how to live in such a difficult situation. For example, if scientist workout everyday and consume enough multivitamins including vitamic C, they could easily survive in the zero-gravity.
Finally, the last text explains that as a matter of fact, the solar radiation which is emmited by sun can be proved deadly to astronauts. On the contrary, the professor undemines this point and describes that even though solar radiation pass through space craft frequently, however, by taking a few cautious steps, astronaums can make their dream to Mars possible. One of them precautions is bulit a small shield inside the craft which can serve as a protective area for scientists. Additionally, with the help of advanced detectors, solar radiations can be detected, and people in the craft would securely go the shield area when the detectors signal danger to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , water
...not have capacity to take a load of food,water and other essentials. Nonetheless, the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'fresh water'.
Suggestion: fresh water
...his but also the craft can provide them a fresh water by recycling the waste products. Mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Neverthless
...n cause severe bone damage in the body. neverthless, the lecture refuts this by asserting f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'faced'.
Suggestion: faced
...s not new for scientist since they have face similar issues earlier too and they do ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...tion. For example, if scientist workout everyday and consume enough multivitamins includ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...On the contrary, the professor undemines this point and describes that even thoug...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, while, for example, as a matter of fact, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1373.03311258 145% => OK
No of words: 395.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04810126582 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69405155776 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 145.348785872 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584810126582 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 419.366225166 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4936337589 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0664478544164 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215173234615 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266955549612 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042325083342 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237031127539 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 63.6247240618 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.