How would you choose a student leader in the university? Reading the school newspaper to know the view of the student; Listening to the students (e.g., speeches or interviews); Getting the recommendation from the teachers who teach the students.
Irrefutably, leadership is a rudimentary requirement in order to run the association or organization. On that ground, there are plentiful crucial factors which need to have in a person in order to be a good leader. In this regard, many people contend that the best way that school leaders could decide is knowing from teachers. On the other side, there is a group of people who think that students’ ideas in newspapers or speeches and interviews can reflect their abilities to be a good leader. Apparently, from my vantage point, the former point contains more weight. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my stance.
The firts exquisite reason to be mentioned is that as a matter of fact, no one can draw a real attributes of student better than their teachers as students spend most of their day-to-day time in the school with their teachers. Accordingly, teachers have an extensive ideas of student’s ability to handle complex scenarios and their decision making capacity which would make them a perfect media to reveal wheather a particular student can be a good leader or not in the future. On the contrary, reading articles in the newspaper and speeches can be manipulated nowadays, and therefore, people cannot trust those documents blindly to make a strong leader. To shed more light on this, my personal example is utterly compelling example of what has been mentioned above. When I was in the medical university, our professors used to deciede vote for final candidate for a leadership in the university whereby a leader had to manage a coplex system of univesity for solely whole year. Certianly, students always invited the final decision of teachers wholeheartedly since we believed that they could never be wrong to take certain decision for the betterment of a school. Ultimately, it is judicious to say teachers are greatly valuable to decide for a good leader.
Another noteworthy point is that having a significant experience in the field of studies, teachers can better able to make a good decision for a leadership. In fact, dealing with students in the classroom in various activities, it would be easier for teachers to fetch ideas from students’ minds so that they make a fruitful decision related to a leadership of students. However, taling about article in the printing paper is not at all trustworthy document because ideas and thoughts that are descibed in the paper can be borrowed from somewhere else. Similarly, while giving a speech on a stage or in debate, people perhaps present ideas which might not be indigenous and native, and positioning a leader based on these circumstances might prove a wrong decision in future. To exeplify, a data statistic from research conducted at the University of California shows that in the modern education system, 87% of teachers are succefully make a leader which would have a impressive benefits to the school. Admittedly, it is reasonable to assert that teachers have the ability to decide a good leader.
To recapitulate, although some may not agree with my viewpoint, I implicitly believe that no one can be better than a school staff to give a opinion of student leadership. This is because they are very close to students, and thereby, it becomes easy to make judgement. Besides, teachers are well experience to make the final decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...st way that school leaders could decide is knowing from teachers. On the other side, there...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...st way that school leaders could decide is knowing from teachers. On the other side, there...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 268, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'idea'?
Suggestion: idea
...Accordingly, teachers have an extensive ideas of student’s ability to handle complex ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 766, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...cumstances might prove a wrong decision in future. To exeplify, a data statistic from res...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 968, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ccefully make a leader which would have a impressive benefits to the school. Admi...
^
Line 8, column 981, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
... a leader which would have a impressive benefits to the school. Admittedly, it is reason...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 140, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n be better than a school staff to give a opinion of student leadership. This is ...
^
Line 10, column 297, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
...e judgement. Besides, teachers are well experience to make the final decision.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, besides, but, e.g., however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, as a matter of fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3049.0 1977.66487455 154% => OK
No of words: 601.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07321131448 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95129289623 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88822870558 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485856905158 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 956.7 618.680645161 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7242005864 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.041666667 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0416666667 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172494110632 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546395779285 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462665684266 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992110979385 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481107956717 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 86.8835125448 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.