The reading states that there is not any possibility for a human to travel to Mars and presents three reasons of support. The lecturer, However, find all the ideas dubious and provides some evidem]nce to refute them all.
First, the author argues that it takes 2 years to travel to Mars and come back to earth and during this time the astronauts may face a lack of food, water, and Oxygen. Conversely, the professor underlines the fact that they can establish hydroponics for growing plants in water. As a result, the plants can absorb carbon dioxide and turn it to Oxygen. Also, she explains that they can recycle water and improve its quality to drinkable water.
Second, the article posits that the astronauts can suffer from health problems on the zero-gravity conditions. On the contrary, the speaker opposes this view by explaining that they have faced to zero-gravity in other missions, furthermore, they have several techniques to manage these conditions. She asserts that they can exercise regularly in order to not being weakened their muscles and they can increase the amount of calcium by consuming it in order to not being decreased their bones.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that there are harmful levels of space radiation, and it is a must to have a shield to being protected from these radiations. In contrast, the professor dismisses this issue due to the fact that this radiation is not at a dangerous level and it is occasionally. Admittedly, we have to equip the spacecraft to special things on its shield, and it is not necessary until it is at danger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
...e ideas dubious and provides some evidem]nce to refute them all. First, the au...
^
Line 6, column 107, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... levels of space radiation, and it is a must to have a shield to being protected from t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89298892989 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6627036269 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553505535055 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.68979747 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0815281888576 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297186029693 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398920108947 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483743082311 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169031782555 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.