Self Driving Cars
The author states about benefits of self-driving cars and how it will have a positive impact on us, in the response the lecturer disagrees and casts doubt on these reasons and continues by showing how the points made by the author do not hold water.
First of all, the author claims that autonomous cars will reduce traffic accidents because the software runs them instead of humans who are very much capable of making mistakes. Furthermore, the Author provides one example of a self-driven car that ran approximately 70,0000 miles without an accident. In contrast, the lecturer tells that software are developed by humans and prone to errors, so they are not safe. In addition to this, the lecturer asserts that the example which the author mentions about the car met with an accident the next day. This news created a fuzz all over the world.
Secondly, the reading claims that autonomous cars are safer for the environment due to their efficiency and they stuck very less in traffic jams as they can communicate with each other. In response, the lecturer says that as the cars self-driven there will be no age restriction in getting a driving license. As a result, the number of cars on the roads will be increased and thereby, will increase pollution. Even the cars are fuel-efficient, there will be no benefit from it due to an increase in the number of cars. Consequently, the lecturer shows the inaccuracy of the author's belief of cars making the world less polluted.
Third, the author explains that self-driving cars will provide free time to the drivers and the drivers can do different tasks at this time such as reading, watching videos, or doing work. On the other hand, the lecturer thinks that this is not a benefit for the drivers as they find driving entertaining and enjoys it. Moreover, driving is a good distraction for people who are very busy with their work. This leisure time will be wasted as people will be busy working and will not enjoy it. In this way, the lecturer shows the weakness of the author's third reason because free time will be a waste of the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he lecturer shows the inaccuracy of the authors belief of cars making the world less po...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 364.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75274725275 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53907989234 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491758241758 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7388730491 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29079836559 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102782261952 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942699333599 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198347660829 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484050530178 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.