Simulated Meat
The reading and the lecture both about simulated meat. The author of the reading presents 3 reasons why simulated meat are better than regular meat. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that simulated meat not as beneficial as its been told.
According to the author, simulated meat is environment friendly because the vegetables that used to make simulated meat, require less land and cause less pollution than the regular meat industries. The author also mentions that rainforest is often strip down to create more land. These arguments are challanged by the lecturer. He explains that simulated meat is not fully better for the environment because in order to grow vegetables, farmers use chemical fertilizer and pesticide that can harm the environment. Addicitonally, he points out that rainforest is still cut down to make a place for farming crops.
Secondly, the author suggests that regular meat contains unhealty meat and carcinogens materials. Simulated meat uses vegetable as its ingredients, cause it to have more minerals and vitamins than regular meat. The author, howerer, asserts that eventhough simulated meat is made from vegetable which is healthier, the processes to make simulated meat are not healty because the processes use oil and sodium which are bad.
Finally, the author posits that simulated meat contains fewer bacteria unlike regular meat. The aurthor also contends that simulated meat are cooked nicely that to bacteria are survive, thus it is safer than regular meat. In contract, the lecture says that despite of less bacteria, simulated meat can cause unexpected alergic reaction. He notes that people usually know which type of regular meat than they can not eat, but because simulated meat contains multiple ingredients, it is impossible to distinguish which vegetable that cause the alergic reaction. Thus, simulated meat is not safer than regural meat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ated meat are better than regular meat. The lecturer disputes the claims made in th...
^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'survived'.
Suggestion: survived
... are cooked nicely that to bacteria are survive, thus it is safer than regular meat. In...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun bacteria is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tract, the lecture says that despite of less bacteria, simulated meat can cause unex...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, second, secondly, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34098360656 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63659565668 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475409836066 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.8964069015 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8235294118 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.663547283639 0.272083759551 244% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301437869928 0.0996497079465 302% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188663845986 0.0662205650399 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.508462942911 0.162205337803 313% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888865740143 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.