Plastic bags are terrible for the environment They should be banned everywhere

Essay topics:

Plastic bags are terrible for the environment. They should be banned everywhere.

It is critically important that we keep our environment clean. Personally, I believe that plactic bags have bad impacts to the environment. I have two reasons that support my opinion, which I explain in the following essay.

First of all, plastics bags are used everywhere because they can hold many kinds of things, they are water resistance, and they are also durable. Although plastic bags have so many beneficial traits, their characterics are also what make them bad for environment. Plastic bags can exist hundred of years because they are not bio degradable or destroyed naturally. Moreover, people throw plastic bags everywhere, the plastic bags can end up in the soils or even the sea. Some animals that can not distinguish plastic bag and food, end up swallow the plastics bags. This will sufface the animals and kill them or even make them suffer for their entire life. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Around 3 years ago, my mother bought fish from the market. As usual, my family like to have baked fish. While the fish was in the oven, suddenly I smelled something bad that came from the fish, Curiously I slice open the fish and found out a ball of plastic bags are inside the fish. The fish must have suffer because of the plastic bags.

Furthermore, the process of making plactic bags are bad for the environment. Plastic are made from oil that are located in the reservoir beneath the surface. In order to produce the oil, oil company will cut down forest to secure the land for oil rig. This first steps itself already harm the environment because animals that living in the forest lose their habitats. Oil production itself usually produced harmful chemical such as acid gas or contaminated water. Oil company who want to save money, usually dump these dangerous chemical directly to the environment without treat them first. After the oil are produced and arrive to the refinery, the oil will be process into plastic that will produce dangerous chemical and pollution as its side affect.

In conclusion, I strongly feel that plastics should be banned. This is because plastic bags itself and and the process of making plastic bags are harming the environment.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...for environment. Plastic bags can exist hundred of years because they are not bio degra...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1021, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
...are inside the fish. The fish must have suffer because of the plastic bags. Further...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[12]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)?
Suggestion: side effect
...dangerous chemical and pollution as its side affect. In conclusion, I strongly feel that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ed. This is because plastic bags itself and and the process of making plastic bags are ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91466666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51652529404 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509333333333 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8679186964 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1304347826 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3043478261 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301771223325 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851665139997 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746213752038 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177430443104 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929597120888 0.0645574589148 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.