It is universally acknowledged that good environment, which greatly contributes to people's physical and psychological, is of great importance to the local community. It is therefore crucial for people to take action to protect the environment, especially when considering the severe pollution problems nowadays. Among these three choices, planting trees and creating parks could not only bring various benefits, but is also the most feasible way. I would delve into the reasons behind in the following paragraph.
To commence with, trees absorb toxic air pollutants such as carbon dioxide, and this helps to increase air quality and alleviate pollution. Air pollution is a severe problem in most of the communities because of the increasing number of vehicles, generation of electricty, and incineration of waste materials. These human activities produce a large amount of toxic gas such as sulphur dioxide and carbon dioxide. The pollutants released into air could cause severe enviromental and health problems, such as acid rain and respiratory diseases. Planting more trees could help to absorb these pollutants and release oxygen, and this would help to improve the air quality and reduce pollution.
Moreover, planting trees and creating parks would increase the recreational areas for citizens to relax, which improves their mental health. Research reveals that exposing to green environment could help people to relax. However, it is an ominpresent problem that communities, especially the newly built one, do not have enough green area. There is no better manifestation than Tin Shui Wai, a newly built community in Hong Kong. When the government decided to solve the over-population problem in the central city, it planned to construct a new community, the Tin Shui Wai, and encouraged people to move there. However, the city planning failed to considered about green area in the new community, and the citizens complaint about it after moving there as they found that lacking green area would make them feel stressed.
Some critics may think that the other two methods would improve the environment to a larger extent. Admittedly, reducing plastic bags and reducing vehicles on the road would bring many benefits. However, these critics failed to consider the feasibility. Reducing plastic bags would decrease the plastic wastes. However, alternatives of plastic bags, such as paper bags, have a leven arger carbon footprint than plastic bags, which means that producing them would cause greater air pollution. A better approach is to reduce plastic wastes is to reuse the plastic bags, but not stop using them. Using more public transports would reduce the air pollution. However, it is difficult to promote the public transports simply because of the conveniency of private cars. Past historys show that the promotion of public transports in area that most people have their own cars often end up in failure.
Judging from the above evidences, we could safely draw the conclusion that planting trees and creating parks is the best way to improve environment as it brings multiple benefits and is the most feasible method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...reen area in the new community, and the citizens complaint about it after moving there a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33939393939 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7458997268 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4009008918 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.72 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252538516217 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657925436208 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491970482948 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127289080893 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245722311874 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.