smart cars
Both the author and the lecturer discuss whether smarts cars promise to provide better condition rather than the conventional cars or not. The passage claims that smart cars make driving safer, quicker, and less expensive. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mention in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about the rate of accidents. According to the passage, smart cars enjoy some sensors that provide extremely accurate information about surroundings. In addition, smart cars have automatic programs that control braking and turning to avoid collision. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects author's view and illustrates the idea that smart cars are very close together in high speeds, so they cause worse accident rather than conventional cars.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecture discuss the smart car's effect on traffic problems. The author argues that the increased speed of smart cars will be a great benefit and decrease the hours of people's commute. However, the professor refutes this, saying that easier driving provided by smart cars encourage people to use them that it means additional cars commute in highways. Therefore, added cars do not reduce commuting time.
Eventually, the passage and the lecturer address the subject of costs. The passage goes on to mention that smart cars move in the most direct routes, so they reduce the cost of repairs and replacement parts. In contrast, the professor points out that smart cars have several lateral cost such as replacement of sensors which conventional cars do not have. In addition, if smart cars break down their repair cost are very expensive than conventional cars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32481751825 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53109228453 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565693430657 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2922703739 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.608473838254 0.272083759551 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236117531266 0.0996497079465 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129238236 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.423186322992 0.162205337803 261% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465205428986 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.