Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's modern world, numerous careers has emerged and lots of job has disappeared, but some vocations always is required for society development such as doctors and teachers and they were appreciated during history because of their vital role in community flourishing. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among teachers about their value in society. Some teachers believe that teaching value were more appreciated in the past. Others, however, advocate the idea that tutoring is more valued by society nowadays. I personally, concur with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most important reasons.
To begin with, a prosperous society needs successful people who was learned with teachers. People are more sophisticated these days than in the past, so they know the value of the education and teachers more than the past. Well-educated parents pay attention to their offspring's education circumstances and appreciate teachers in charge of trainer. As opposed to old illiterate families that had a lot of child and did not feel concern about education at all. For example, I can recall that my father told me when he was teenager, my grandfather went to his high school. When the manager asked my grandfather about the number of my father class, he did not know which grade his son studied. Now, my father knows my education situation down to the small details. This clearly demonstrates that these days, parents are more involved in their children's education development and they know the value of teachers.
Second of all, nowadays upbringing children are more arduous because not only are parents more busy, but also children are less docile and law-abiding. Because of today's hectic life, parents take their children to kindergarten from early ages and they expect that teachers teach their children all materials they need to be successful person and behave to them such as parents. In addition, children are more disobedient than the past because of some reasons, so parents know teachers have difficult responsibility to deal with children. Therefore, parents appreciate teachers thanks to their attempt to raising their children in the best way.
To sum up, I really believe that the position of teachers are higher than the past on the ground that today's educated people know the value of teaching and hectic lifestyle along with dealing with disobedient children shows the importance of their role in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of jobs'.
Suggestion: lots of jobs
...world, numerous careers has emerged and lots of job has disappeared, but some vocations alw...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun child seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of children'.
Suggestion: a lot of children
...sed to old illiterate families that had a lot of child and did not feel concern about educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bedient children shows the importance of their role in the society.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74250289011 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518796992481 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6118058129 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.421052632 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229620843691 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830956926971 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789583930008 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153469068325 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692001240573 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.