The Ice Age
tpo 27
both the author and the lecturer discuss the cause of the little ice age. The passage claims that several possible causes have been proposed for ice age. The professor, on the other hand, completely reject whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about melting glacier in a period of warm weather. According to the passage, melted glaciers produced by warm weather sent a large amount of cold water into the gulf stream that affects earth's climate. The lecturer, nevertheless, reject the author's view and illustrates the idea that disrupting the gulf stream occurred in America and Europe and in some areas such as New Zealand that was not exposed to the disrupting of ocean current the little ice age is seen.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecture discuss volcanic eruption. The author argues that volcanic eruption sent dark clouds of dust to the atmosphere and these clouds block some sunlight from reaching earth's surface which decrease the global temperature. However, the professor refutes this, saying that dust have to change the color of snow from white to gray but there is no strong enough evidence for the presence of dust in this period.
Eventually, the passage and the lecture address the subject of decreasing human populations. The passage goes on to mention that forest trees started growing and they absorbed carbon dioxide which caused decreasing the temperature. In contrast, the professor points out that increased population needed crops, so people started cutting down the trees and decrease in number of the forests led to increase in carbon dioxide and temperature of the earth.
All in all, the author maintains that there are some reasons for occurrence of ice age, while the professor not only cast doubt on it, but he also demonstrates that there are no evidence to proof the causes of this event.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the author and the lecturer discuss the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08517350158 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44237796471 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558359621451 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4361649752 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413757560652 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132646282433 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838155850762 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20024290374 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625411372954 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.