tpo 42
glass and birds
Both the author and the lecturer discuss effectiveness of solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds. The passage claims that there are several solutions that could be operative to prevent birds from harm. The professor, on the other hand, completely reject whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about one-way glass. According to the passage, one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction could be as a solid barrier and birds will not try to fly through it. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects author's view and illustrates the idea that birds confuse the one-way glass with a mirror so they approach to reflection of object in glass and get hurt.
Second of all, the reading and the lecture discuss colorful design. The author argues that designers can use stripes painted over the glass. By doing so, people would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the strips and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass. However, the professor refutes this, saying that birds consider unpainted areas with open holes and they try to fly through them. To avoid this, unpainted spaces have to be very small which make the room of the building too dark.
Eventually, the passage and the lecturer address the subject of magnetic field. The passage goes on to mention that artificial magnetic field guide birds away from buildings because birds have an ability to sense magnetic fields. In contrast, the professor points out that birds use magnetic field to navigate just in long-distance migrations and in short-distance trips they use their eyes and brightness of light to find their direction.
All in all, the author maintains that there are several ways to stop bird's hit with glass, while professor not only cast doubt on it, but he also demonstrates that these solutions do not work efficiently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, thus, while, in contrast, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0487804878 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52063907697 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3645416487 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.571116046498 0.272083759551 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177416055498 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109184239515 0.0662205650399 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277349683772 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107930411847 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.