Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the leader say something incorrect, In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or meeting is over and people are gone, and then talk the teacher or meeting leader; 3. Say nothing.
By and large, teachers pass series of laws in the first day of their work and expect their students to consider them. Some of them ask their students not to speak until the end of the lecture. Others, however, encourage students to participate in discussion parallel to them. I personally, concur with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve in to the most important reasons. To begin with, when people express their idea in a gathering, it makes better atmosphere that help everyone to feel comfort and express their thought. In other words, if a meeting is managed only by one person and he/she is a sole speaker, audience become bored and distracted after a few minutes. As opposed to a situation, which all member of the companion participate in debate and discuss their opinion about the authenticity of a subject. Asking question or correcting the mistake of leader or teacher give rise to convenient atmosphere where all member of group are active and have right to convey their knowledge. For example, I can recall my mathematics class in high school. Our teacher asked us to disagree where we thought she mistook. When we corrected her mistake, we were confident about understanding the concept deeply. In addition, she got pleasure from our attention. It is crystal clear that saying nothing or delay correcting one's idea is not the best solution. At the end of the meeting, the attention on subject is lost and not only cannot teacher concentrate on matter, but other members are not able to get the correct information as well, so it takes much more time to obtain consensus rather than when individuals interrupt leader's speak during lecture. In addition, waiting until the end of the class to convince leader may cause wasting rest of the class time which is spent on continuing leader's mistake. Therefore, the member have to attend in an extra session to understand the correct answer. Last but not least, by correcting teacher’s statement, self-confident is instilled in students which is a key factor in student’s success. When students express their ideas without any fear in class, regardless it is true or not, they learn how convey their knowledge in an appropriate fashion. If they can convince their teachers that they are right, their self-assured increases dramatically which is one the purposes of the education. This clearly demonstrates that do the talking parallel to teacher is helpful. All in all, I really believe that leaders and teachers should allow attendant to convey their viewpoint parallel to their teaching. This is because it can improve atmosphere by prevent meeting from being tedious and save member's time. Hence, should teacher let their student to transfer their thought immediately after their statement, the productivity and efficiency of the class rise dramatically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1337, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...that saying nothing or delay correcting ones idea is not the best solution. At the e...
^^^^
Line 1, column 2194, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate fashion" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., they learn how convey their knowledge in an appropriate fashion. If they can convince their teachers th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, really, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, by and large, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0835117773 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80857628159 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546038543897 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4340675343 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9166666667 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4583333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180993105303 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485977884917 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424184507341 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180993105303 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.