Solar system colonization
The article states that Saturn's moon Titan is more suitable for human colonization than Mars and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that Mars is a better place than Titan for colonization and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that Titan and Earth are quite similar in some aspects like atmospheric pressure which will make it more habitable. The professor refutes these points by saying that atmosphere is not an important thing to consider as people living there should still wear space suits which protects them from the harsh climate.
Second, the article posits that lower gravity on Titan will help in reducing overall fuel usage of rockets as most of the fuel is used in landings and takeoffs. However, the professor in the lecture says that lower gravity has detrimental effects on human beings. He states that lower gravity slows the human heart which will have serious repercussions in long term.
Third, the reading says that the longer distance between Earth and Titan shouldn't be a matter of concern as a very minimal amount of fuel is consumed in a vacuum. The professor opposes this by saying that distance between Earth and Titan matters a lot as communication will take a longer time. He also says that the longer distance delays the supply of required logistics to Titan.
To sum it up, both writer and professor hold conflicting views about the colonization of Titan and Mars where the writer supports Titan colonization and the professor supports the colonization of Mars. It's clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...longer distance between Earth and Titan shouldnt be a matter of concern as a very minima...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05166051661 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47047901584 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546125461255 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4671577092 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.077680401843 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284806408994 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536585972859 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.050871139264 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640468712334 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.