Spartacus as a hero
The readings presents three reasons on why Sparracus has been admired by historians and the general public. Whereas the lecturer contradicts these reasons mentioning that they are not historically accurate relying on stories.
First, the passage notes that Sparracus and his army had a admirable goal of returing to their homelands. The lecturer, however, points out that this is not aligned with the available historical facts. In fact they had an opportunity to return home, instead, they marched towards Rome. This facts admits that Sparracus wanted to conqur Rome with an aim for revenge and wealth.
Second, the reading suggests that Sparracus's first victories against Roman army is an illustration his sheer military skills. However, the speaker states that the reason behind these intial achievements is that at the biginning of the war, the Romans did not take him and his army seriously. Therefore, they sent a poorly trained and ill-equipped army to put down the Sparracus's men. Once they replaced with the best Roman army they lost the battle. This means that Sparracus was not a genious.
Third, Sparracus's advocacy for human rights of the slaves is not based on reality. In the 18th century in Europe, there was an anti-slavory movement. This movement needed a spritual hero, leading to writing a story based on Sparracus life presenting him as an inspiring anti-slavory historic figure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'present'.
Suggestion: present
The readings presents three reasons on why Sparracus has been...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... has been admired by historians and the general public. Whereas the lecturer contradicts these...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d by historians and the general public. Whereas the lecturer contradicts these reasons ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e notes that Sparracus and his army had a admirable goal of returing to their hom...
^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...me, instead, they marched towards Rome. This facts admits that Sparracus wanted to c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'admit'.
Suggestion: admit
..., they marched towards Rome. This facts admits that Sparracus wanted to conqur Rome wi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed army to put down the Sparracuss men. Once they replaced with the best Roman army ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2389380531 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67915147235 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62389380531 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5455614783 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5714285714 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0225532995533 0.272083759551 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0068489662382 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246942989557 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0152868046551 0.162205337803 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026477522348 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.