The reading and the lecture are both about the sources of the quackers sounds that Russian's sailors have heard underwater from 1960s to 1980s. The author of passage feels that there are three possible theories that explained the cause of the strange sounds. The lecturer challenges these claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the writer suggests that the odd noises were made by the orca whales to attract a male in the courtship ritual. He mentions that the Orcas's studies points out that the sound made by the calls of orca whales are similar to the quackers sounds. The lecturer rebuts this claim by mentioning that the orca whales live near by the water surface. However, the Russian submarines operates in deep of the ocean. As a result, the quackers sounds could not make by the orca whales.
Secondly, the passage points out that the sounds were made by giant squid. The professor, in contrast, feels that the quackers sound could not made by the squid because the quackers sound appeered from 1960s to 1980s, but the the squid have been detected long time before and even today. Therefore, the quackers sound should detected nowadays if they made by the giant squid.
Finally, the author mentions that the quackers sound probably made by the foreign submarines. The lecturer challenges this point by mentioning that the quackers sound was moving to fast and changing direction quickly. Moreover, with today technology, the are no engine submarine can behave such an advanced fast and silence. Thus it is impossible that the quackers sound are made by the submarines from other country
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lained the cause of the strange sounds. The lecturer challenges these claims made b...
^^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...by mentioning that the orca whales live near by the water surface. However, the Russian...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...feels that the quackers sound could not made by the squid because the quackers sound...
^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...sound appeered from 1960s to 1980s, but the the squid have been detected long time befo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...sound appeered from 1960s to 1980s, but the the squid have been detected long time befo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ickly. Moreover, with today technology, the are no engine submarine can behave such an ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...have such an advanced fast and silence. Thus it is impossible that the quackers soun...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92142857143 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33238075794 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6918919155 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.125 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154471416465 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589320541603 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482350930516 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099960266078 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264810398046 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.