Both the reading and listening discuss the source of the quackers which are underwater strange sounds heard by the sailors during patrolling of the Russian submarines in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The author believes that there are possible theories about that sound. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that none of these theories are correct.
To begin with, the author suggests that Orca whales are the source of the quakers since they are available in the patrolling area and they use this sound to attract the males for mating. The lecturer challenges this argument by asserting that the Orca whales are most unlikely the source of these sounds. The Orca whales live near the water surface of the ocean, but the submarine sail deep in the ocean, which makes it very hard for the sailors to hear their sound. In addition, she mentions that Orca whales could be easily detected by the Russian sonar.
Secondly, the writer argues that giant squids are the cause of the quakers since it is very hard to be detected by the sonar and they can emit similar sounds. The lecturer, however, refutes this point by claiming that these strange sounds had been detected in 1960 and it lasted for 2 decades. In other words, these strange sounds appeared suddenly and completely disappeared by 1980. Based on that, the giant squids can not be considered the reason for the sounds since they still live in the patrolling area till now.
Finally, the author posits that the noisy sounds were from secret submarines from foreign countries that intentionally make it undetectable by sonar for military purposes. In contrast, the lecturer cast doubt on this by pointing out that there was no engine noise accompanied by these sounds and the sound was very fast that indicates the submarine moves swiftly and changes their direction frequently. Moreover, she mentions that even the current and modern technology could not develop that fast submarine and silent engine. So, This theory is not correct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th Atlantic and Arctic Ocean. The author believes that there are possible theorie...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t none of these theories are correct. To begin with, the author suggests that ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that Orca whales are the source of the quakers since they are available in the...
^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re the source of the quakers since they are available in the patrolling area and...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easily detected by the Russian sonar. Secondly, the writer argues that giant s...
^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is very hard to be detected by the sonar and they can emit similar sounds. The le...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lecturer, however, refutes this point by claiming that these strange sounds had b...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ared suddenly and completely disappeared by 1980. Based on that, the giant squids...
^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red the reason for the sounds since they still live in the patrolling area till n...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...live in the patrolling area till now. Finally, the author posits that the nois...
^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...secret submarines from foreign countries that intentionally make it undetectable ...
^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entionally make it undetectable by sonar for military purposes. In contrast, the ...
^^
Line 4, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd silent engine. So, This theory is not correct.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, in addition, in contrast, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 348.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97988505747 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42028921981 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6455191851 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3125 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249756711183 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774470186273 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741932378577 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15704455332 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519901333289 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.