Study of cooperation and conflict between same age groups children
In an overview, in this speech and reading discussed about study in same-age peer groups and how organized them. moreover, discussed about drawbacks and benefits aspect Of the dividing children between two group equally. Deliberately, the essential indications in the lecture cast doubt on the fundamental points in the reading.
First of all, the lecture states that the first thing the researcher noticed was that when the boys were divided randomly separated into two group, there was an increases negative attitudes between them or ever competition between them inversely badly. For example they started tease or belittle each other. However, this is contrasts the topic in reading that the asserts that the peer groups build tolerance and decrease conflict because children are equal in terms of status and power.
Furthermore, about to delve conflict and cooperative, the lecture declares that in the when student put back together, the conflict will reduce and cooperation in the tasks increases. Although, this is opposite with clues of the reading that clearly indicates when students are in divided groups, the contests and competition between same age peer groups will reduce.
Finally, the lecture concluded that when children at the same age are divided into group, competition comes from naturally than cooperation. While, this challenges the content in the text that believes cooperation comes naturally to children of the same age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...age peer groups and how organized them. moreover, discussed about drawbacks and benefits...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an increase' or simply 'increases'?
Suggestion: an increase; increases
...mly separated into two group, there was an increases negative attitudes between them or ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... comes from naturally than cooperation. While, this challenges the content in the tex...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63733517913 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561946902655 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4850446387 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413106121052 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145274031296 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854348986689 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240186924859 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531196912852 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.