Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. Why edmontosaur migrated?
The reading and lecture are both about the existence edmontosaur, which the author of reading believes that there are some reasons which can prove the migration hypothesis. The lecture challenges the theory made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these reasons are not convincing.
First of all, the author suggests that the edmontosaur forced to migrate to more temperate zones for finding foods. This idea is challenged by the lecture. She says that summer temperatures in the North Slope area were warmer than today, therefore, conditions were suitable for plants growing. Furthermore, she argues that sun shines 24 hours a day at the peak of the summer, so much more vegetation was produced, then they died in the winter, but edmontosaurs could alive on dead plants matter.
Secondly, the writer contends that many skeletons have been discovered that shows edmontosaur lived in herd ant it can demonstrate that edmontosaur migrated at that time. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that living in herds provides other things for animals such as protection from predators. She elaborates on this by mentioning that living with this style does not mean the edmontosaur migrated because some animals like Roosevelt elk populations live in a herd, but they do not migrate.
Finally, it is stated in the article that edmontosaurs were able to migrate for long distances. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that adult edmontosaurs had this ability, but juveniles could not run for great distances to reach warmer places because they had not physically capable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...allenges the theory made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2015503876 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69495541492 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7179637373 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150235418213 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561361034009 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324549149206 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898934516554 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193820442547 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.