Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage
The article declares that clay jars were excavated by local villagers during constructing a railroad line that doesn't produce electricity and provides three reasons for supports. However, the professor explains that reasons were given in the article are not convinced, it needs to be corrected and refutes each of the author's reasons.
To begin with, the reading states that vessels were not used as batteries because it was not connected to any metal wires. On the other hand, the professor contradicts this point by stating that, the jar was discovered by the local people, not by archaeologists, there might be some other material near the jar but local people didn't recognize the importance of that material and they might have thrown away.
Furthermore, the article claims that inside jar looks the same as other copper cylinders used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, not for generating electricity. Nonetheless, the professor says that looks don't prove anything. They might discover later that if they use iron and water jar will generate electricity.
Moreover, the reading claims that there was no use of batteries vessels for the ancient people. The professor says that ancient people were using mild electricity for heading purpose like for pain, fever. Even they might use to show the magical power of these vessels that can generate mild shock.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...uring constructing a railroad line that doesnt produce electricity and provides three ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... material near the jar but local people didnt recognize the importance of that materi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...etheless, the professor says that looks dont prove anything. They might discover lat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22624434389 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56090209275 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574660633484 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0062291901 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0752549615942 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304175951479 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286003320935 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0454611027494 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210254423761 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.