Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.

Chevalier de Seingalt wrote a memoir recounting his life and adventures, his memoir becomes a precious historical source for European society in the eighteenth century. The article declares that memories of the Chevalier were altered many events to show his life more exciting and luxurious than it was and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that its memoir was pretty accurate and it was a reliable source for history and refutes each of the author's reasons.

To begin with, the passage states that Chevalier's life in Switzerland was not wealthy as he mentions in his memoir because he used to borrow money from a Swiss merchant. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts these points by stating that to do parties and do gambling need lots of money. So he did sell his properties and to have cash on hand it takes a couple of days, during this time he might be out of cash so he probably borrows money from a Swiss merchant.

Furthermore, the reading states that the memoir of conversations between Chevalier and Voltaire is not accurate. No one can remember all that conversation. Nonetheless, the speaker says that Chevalier uses to write a note every night about his talk. And there might a possibility he kept those notes with him when he was preparing.

Finally, the article contends that Chevalier's escape from a notorious prison in Venice, Italy, was not correct. The instructor explains that there were many prisoners, they have more political connections than Chevalier. He also mentions that int he government history they did mention that celling to be repaired in the room where Chevalier was kept as a prisoner after his escape.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00709219858 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68901904032 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578014184397 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9643332109 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0507041819286 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0201250747021 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248984950148 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0319411181553 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200354427284 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.