Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
"Great hoses " which is used by settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico has a stone building that contains hundreds of rooms with three or four stories high. Archaeologists try to determine what is the purpose of this building. Both the lecturer and reading discuss three types of the purpose of this property. The former was not convinced about the usage of the building while the lateral emphasizes the reasons for the building.
The first point of the discussion revolves around the Chaco building were used for residential purposes. The instructor explains that the inside structure of the building cast doubts about its residential use. He says that if it uses for families they suppose to have many fireplaces for cooking but they don't have many. They just have ten fireplaces which are not enough for 100 families to leave. However, the article claims that Chaco houses appear similar to the well-known "apartment buildings" at Taos, New Mexico, in which many people have been living for centuries.
Moreover, another topic of debate is Chaco property was used to store food supplies. Once again the speaker was not agreed about the usage of the building. He mentions that if this property was used for storage of grain maize then why they didn't find any evidence of grain maize during excavation and there were no big containers for storage also, neither there was any spile of maize on the floor. On the other hand, the text mention that the size of the building was perfect to store maize for a long period without damage.
Last but not least, we reach the final argument about the property were used as ceremony purpose. The professor says that evidence was not well supported. He points out that they found other building construction materials like sand, etc with the large broken pot. He says that these large pots might use for food storage for the people who work in that property. Nevertheless, the passage highlight that a large number of broken pots were used for special ceremonies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing were used for residential purposes. The instructor explains that the inside str...
^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ve many fireplaces for cooking but they dont have many. They just have ten fireplace...
^^^^
Line 13, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Moreover, another topic of debate is Chaco property was used to store food su...
^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...operty was used to store food supplies. Once again the speaker was not agreed about ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...or storage of grain maize then why they didnt find any evidence of grain maize during...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 406, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...evertheless, the passage highlight that a large number of broken pots were used for special cerem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99122807018 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51508223684 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5971335512 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8333333333 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0563086874007 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0210826839554 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030528804649 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0346400928435 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257940191629 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.