summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in reading passage.
The reading passage present some evidence indicating that genetic modification can improve productivity and resistance of trees. The lecturer, nonetheless, throws doubt on all the ideas brought up by critics and offers some counterclaims to refute them all.
First the author argues genetically modified tree tolerate harsh situation better that nature tree. Conversely the lecturer takes the view that this fact this not true in all condition also those trees are uniform which induce can withstand just some special problem. For example if climate change or new pest attach to the envoirnment, genetic modification does not work.
Furthermore, the reading highlight the thought that genetically modified trees are cost-effective for farmer because they grow faster and are more productive. The professor, on the contrary, underlies the fact that although these tree are productive but there is some hidden problem that bring about some extra cost for former. For instance they can not cultivate regular seed and former has to buy seeds from company every year so it is not economic as like sound.
Finally, the author brings up the idea that use of genetically modified tree is envoirnmentaly friendly because it exclude deforestation for firewood or timber building. In contrast, the speaker dimisses this issue due in large to the fact that this kinds of tree make more damage to nature because genetically modified trees are more aggressive so make a competitive condition in sources such as sun light or water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...arsh situation better that nature tree. Conversely the lecturer takes the view that this f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etically modified tree is envoirnmentaly friendly because it exclude deforestatio...
^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'excludes'?
Suggestion: excludes
... is envoirnmentaly friendly because it exclude deforestation for firewood or timber bu...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...his issue due in large to the fact that this kinds of tree make more damage to natur...
^^^^
Line 4, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in sources such as sun light or water.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, as to, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3153526971 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79062841717 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630705394191 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1802190138 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.1 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4 7.06452816374 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0433276838144 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.020283296954 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240212628296 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0303358838977 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245308941338 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.