Summarize the main points made in the lecture that you just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. You can refer to the reading passage as you write.
The article claims that there is no guiltiness using animals to research about drugs and pills. So, supports the usage of animals which is called vivisection by showing several reasons.
The author of the reading claims that, Since the main idea of the researches in science is minimize the harm of the human these experiments must be done. Furthermore, the animals are not getting that much harm in the experiments, them suffer is always keeping minimum and anaesthesia is using if it is possible in the experiment process. The author of the article is adding, there is not another alternative instead of animal to use in experiments. Chimpanzees’ genes and human genes have %99 similarity. And the other animals which is used in the experiments and humans have similar daily life style. At the end, there are also so many examples are shown by the author of the text found by the vivisection. Such as germ theory, penicillin and insulin. The researchers used chickens, pigs, rabbits and mice to found these cures in the history.
In the lecture, professor totally against the writer of the reading. She is claiming that there no way to accept the vivisection and use the animals in the scientific experiments. Whatever claimed in the article, animals are getting so much toxic chemicals because of the experiments because she saw them in her laboratory life. And she claims, there are so many cures which has not found by vivisection such as aspirin, she also claims that besides the similarity of the genes if aspirin were used in cats and dogs they would be poisoned but in the horses it has no effect.
She concluded, there is no excuse to use animals in the scientific experiments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-14 | diegof1390 | 60 | view |
| 2018-11-14 | diegof1390 | 3 | view |
| 2018-10-13 | aysedogan777 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- Summarize the main points made in the lecture that you just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. You can refer to the reading passage as you write. 3
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 66
- Q:Do you agree or disagree?your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'minimized'.
Suggestion: minimized
...in idea of the researches in science is minimize the harm of the human these experiments...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... animals in the scientific experiments.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87543252595 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74983550188 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487889273356 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1154223324 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 7.06452816374 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0171184261027 0.272083759551 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00655857676523 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0142284558787 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00847475367747 0.162205337803 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00855044759915 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.