Summarize the point made in the lecture, being sure to explain hoe they challenge specific claims/ arguments made in the reading passage.
The prevailing evidence for man-made climate change is all around us. According to the Met Office, the 10 warmest years in the modern record have all occurred since 1997. Glaciers, moving sheets of ice that are thousands of years old, are melting at a greater rate than ever previously recorded because greenhouse gases are heating up our atmosphere. These are not isolated events, either: there have been reports of ice melting worldwide, and especially at the Earth's poles. Over the last century, this melting has led to the fastest rise in sea level since the beginning of human civilization. this warming could also lead to destructive weather patterns. General precipitation has increased globally, and hurricanes Katrina and Ike were some of the worst storms to strike the United States in many years. As global climate patterns continue to shift. storms of this magnitude are likely to occur more often and become stronger.
Changes in weather patterns could have large negative effects on the world's population. With increased precipitation, humans will be more susceptible to mosquito borne disease such as malaria and dengue fever, which kill about 3 million people per year. Climate change may also affect the migration of people within and between countries around the world. people migrate to other areas for many reasons, including conflicts (such as ethic or resource conflicts)and extreme events (such as flooding or hurricanes). extremes events displace many disasters. Extreme events may become more frequent and sever because of climate change, which could increase the number of people migrating during and after these types of events. Coastal settlements are particularly vulnerable to flooding from storms surges. Both developing and developed countries are vulnerable to the impacts of sea level rise. For example, the Netherlands, Guyana, and Bangladesh are all low lying countries that are particularly at risk.
The lecture and passage both discuss prevailing the evidence about the climate change done by the human activities. The point of view of the lecturer, however,clearly conflict with that of the passage in many ways.
For example, lecture disagree with the passage claim that the climate change is result of the human activities, and warmest years started since 1997 which leads to melting of ice and hurricanes. However, lecturer cast doubt by explaining that data can be manipulated by misleading information. Further lecture mentioned that earth environments few years goes rise in temperature then it goes down and again it rises. This cycle of the climate keeps on going.
Additionally, considering the lecturer's opinion that we just started understanding earth climate and we are finding the evidence of human impact on climate. Certainly, we are not sure what will exactly happen in future. Whereas, passage explains that climate change can provide huge negative impact on humans. Such as, mosquito borne disease, migration, and coastal settlements will become more prompt to danger because of climate change. In contrast, the lecturer point out that if earth goes warmer than we will be able turn barren land into farmland. where we can cultivate food for the more people and the problem of hunger will be resolved.
In conclusion, lecturer stands his point by suggesting that CO2 emissions linger in environment for 50 years. If human damaged the atmosphere than we have to start living with that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , clearly
...e point of view of the lecturer, however,clearly conflict with that of the passage in ma...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... manipulated by misleading information. Further lecture mentioned that earth environmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... rises. This cycle of the climate keeps on going. Additionally, considering the lecture...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...n going. Additionally, considering the lecturers opinion that we just started understand...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e are not sure what will exactly happen in future. Whereas, passage explains that climate...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ure what will exactly happen in future. Whereas, passage explains that climate change c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...be able turn barren land into farmland. where we can cultivate food for the more peop...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ons linger in environment for 50 years. If human damaged the atmosphere than we ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20576131687 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7065177556 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600823045267 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9988968396 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3571428571 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0661454700364 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252980886119 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249672336659 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0383336862395 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134945159639 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.