Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
In contrast to the Reading passage, which emphasizes on use of TED system on boat reduces the possibility of sea turtle being caught and provided three reasons of support, the lecture questions the applicability of the TED and refutes each of the author's point.
First, the reading claims that TED is capable of selecting the sea turtle or any organisms over 10cm which helps in preserving them. However, the professor points out that not all sea turtle are greater than 10cm and smaller and mild one still get caught, shrimps greater than 10cm is also rejected which definitely questions its applicability.
Second, the reading claims that all boats should install TEM compulsorily on their boat creating the possibility that sea turtle would not be caught. The professor opposes this point by explaining that fisherman can easily remove TED when tramps are being released and again install afterward; lack of authority of monitor question its usefulness.
Finally, the reading posit that shrimps from only those nations to be imported which implies STL laws. However, the professor claims that all lot of nations and authorities engage to provide authentication to the boats, such paper can be easily faked and it's hard to trace those sorts of letter.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, so, still, then, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16097560976 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60285844793 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6666438387 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141285322445 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686729185059 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380698375346 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923266531307 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365460950178 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.