Summarize the points made in the lecture that you have just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on parts made in the reading, you can refer the reading passage as you write.
In contrast to the Reading passage, which emphasizes that graffiti art is not a crime and younger should be encouraged to learn this art and provided three reasons of support, the professor claims that graffiti art is actually a crime and should be discouraged.
First, the reading claims that graffiti art is associated with crime, highly opposed and criticized which should not be done; graffiti is form of art and should be appreciated. However, the professor opposes this by saying graffiti is a breaking the law, violating the private space and property. According to him places with graffiti art is associated with high crime rate and lower property value.
Second, the reading posit that graffiti art are delight to see and showed some great works by famous graffiti artist Christ's. However, the professor contradict this by saying that it is not a good comparison. Crestor used to take permission from the public admiration or private property owner before panting and only are in display for short period of time for instance 2 to 3 weeks and disposes after that. But modern graffiti artists are leaving the art where it is spoiling the walls and surrounding.
Third, the reading says that younger graffiti artist should be well trained by the experienced once and decriminalization of graffiti art should be done. The professor opposes this by saying that graffiti art should be criminalized and those artists should be penalized by getting them to erase the painting by themselves as soon as possible as encountered and such kind of art should be discouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nting and only are in display for short period of time for instance 2 to 3 weeks and disposes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, second, so, third, well, for instance, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73562947766 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496153846154 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8544902242 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0142698908241 0.272083759551 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0072858889403 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00912481338382 0.0662205650399 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0111635446207 0.162205337803 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00192414369581 0.0443174109184 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.