summarize the points made in the lecture about Agnostids probable living areas, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about Agnostids living place.
The reading discusses different theories about Agnostid creatures living place. However, the professor, in the lecture, refuses to accept these theories about Agnostids, since she thinks that they have significantly weaknesses. She mentions three reasons to refute each of the proposed hypothesis made in the reading.
First, the article states that Agnostids could be free swimming predators that find their food by hunting smaller animals present in the area. But, professor opposes this belief and she reminds that sea predators use to have strong eye sight for hunting in the water. In contrast, Agnostids had poor eye sight ability and even some of them were almost blind which can bother them in hunting. Moreover, the fossil records do not show any evidence implying that these animals posses good vision.
Second, the passage regards that they may be lived in sea floor deep in the oceans. In contrary, professor illustrates in her lecture that sea floor can not be the Agnostids habitat, because animals who use to live in the bottom of the sea normally move slowly and choose limited local regions as their habitat. But, Agnostids are known for their large living areas and fast moving pace. So, they can not dwell in sea floor logically.
Third, the reading explains that there is a chance that they may be actually be parasites who get their feed from larger organisms. On the other hand, she indicates that this assumption can not be true, since parasites used to colonize in a certain amount of population, while, Agnostids considered as species that are found in large numbers which is similarly proved according to fossil records studied by scientists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...lief and she reminds that sea predators use to have strong eye sight for hunting in...
^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...s that sea predators use to have strong eye sight for hunting in the water. In contrast, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
... water. In contrast, Agnostids had poor eye sight ability and even some of them were almo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 204, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... Agnostids habitat, because animals who use to live in the bottom of the sea normal...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, third, well, while, even so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12363636364 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44285160559 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9845477434 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.384615385 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227827608001 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828202546135 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748958641872 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133284597159 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625859717379 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.