summarize the points made in the lecture about fuel replacement with ethanol, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points in the reading passage according to the professor.
The reading discusses about negative influences of ethanol production. However, professor in the lecture contradicts with the ideas mentioned in the passage and he gives three reasons to support his opinion accordingly.
First, it was mentioned in the reading that ethanol is not notablly helping with greenhouse gases reduction in the atmosphere. But, the professor illustrates that the act of planting corns as the main source of ethanol production can effectively decrease the greenhouse gas emissions rate by absorbing them reversely during their growing period.
Second, the passage argued that excessive use of resources like corns for more ethanol production may damage the ecosystem by resources reduction for other applications like feeding the animals. On the other hand, in the lecture, he believes that the producers and factories can use celulose in plants walls for ethanol production which are not totally eatable by animals. So, their feedstock is not going to alter significantly, as the animals eat just the seeds and the plants crops left behind anyway.
Third, the article mentions that the price of ethanol can not compete with gasoline without the govrenment assistance at all. In contrast, the professor insistes that actually ethanol fuel has the ability to compete with gasoline, since the ethanol factories now are not working in full capacity. Thus, if these producers ethanol in their companies with all of their production capacity, the ethanol price will definately reduce in the market and can compete with fossil fuels like gasoline. For example, if they increase their ethanol output three times in comparison to what is being produced now, the ethanol price can easily decrease to 40 percent less.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... production may damage the ecosystem by resources reduction for other applications like f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 313, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'producers'' or 'producer's'?
Suggestion: producers'; producer's
...orking in full capacity. Thus, if these producers ethanol in their companies with all of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, anyway, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39926739927 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67580850584 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7670905097 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7272727273 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185612158977 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792502742597 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045353273732 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116867090059 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567081759127 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.