summarize the points made in the lecture about possible precautions made for birds safety about glass windows of city buildings, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on solutions proposed in the passage.
The reading explains the possible modifications which can be done to prevent birds from hitting the modern buildings made of glass. However, the professor in the lecture opposes with these solutions, since he thinks these messures can not stop the birds effectively. He provides three reasons to refute each of the acts proposed in the reading respectively.
First, the article states that building ordinary glasses can be changed by one way transparent ones that only let the insiders to see outside and prevent birds from seeing inside the building specifically. But, professor believes that these new glass also would not help the birds either, because they reflect the light as much as the regular glasses and the birds can not determine that whether it is a real sight or just a reflection. They may fly directly into both without any discrimination.
Second, the passage regards that if the windows would be painted by colorful designs, the birds may avoid them consequently. In contrary, professor mentions that this modification can not prevent the birds from coming near these glassy windows, since these color designs force the people to open some of the windows for light and birds consider these open windows as holes and they tend to pass them. Also, this rectification may lead to extreme darkness inside the building.
Third, the reading argues that a magnetic field can also be used to prevent birds from smashing into glassy windows. On the other hand, he believes that this hypothesis is wrong basically, since the birds use earth magnetic field for long distance traveling normally. So, it will have no function for birds in their short trips inside a city where they mostly rely on their eyes and things' brightness for navigation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 297, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... color designs force the people to open some of the windows for light and birds consider th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... So, it will have no function for birds in their short trips inside a city where...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08965517241 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55409023572 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.118907331 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184084673621 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673888162118 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477035317328 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114217598183 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206141195807 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.