summarize the points made in the lecture about possibility of living in Venus planet, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading about human life in Venus.
The reading discusses about the possibility of living in another planet like Venus. It states the difficuties which can prevent humans from making that planet a habitable place for themselves. However, the professor, in the lecture, disagrees with this point of view and she refutes each of the problems mentioned in the reading for showing the harsh condition of Venus, since she thinks that living can be feasable in a station well above the Venus planet.
First, the article states that the atmospheric pressure of this planet is 90 times more than earth. So, it would be logically impossible for humans to live there. But, professor believes that if humans can build a station 50 kilometers above the surface area of planet, it would be possible for them to live there. She reminds that this is true, since at this height the pressure would be similar with the amount that we experience in earth atmosphere normally.
Second, the passage regards that the Venus planet's surface does not contain any water reservoirs and most of its atmospheric environment composition is made of harmful gases like Nitrogen, Carbon dioxide and Sulfuric acid. In contrary, professor relatively opposes with this view and indicates that this problem can be solved easily, because the station can convert these unfriendly chemicals into water and oxygen which are crucial for humans’ survival.
Third, the reading mentions that so much little sun light can get to the planet's surface due to thick dark clouds around the Venus. On the other hand, she thinks that these clouds are not as thick as it considered. Also, the station solar systems have the capability to absorb and convert all of these lights that reflected in various directions into energy for humans in the station efficiently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10544217687 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51013264283 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2685523955 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230388140641 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909929675376 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873341429005 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138601869112 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824657126309 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.