summarize the points made in the lecture about save all species that may become extinct, being sure to
explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about safeguarding of endangered species .
The article states that saving endangered species are unnatural and has several disadvantages and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that contrarily to article people should prevent from extinction of animals if it is possible. Also he mentions that loss of each species has real consequences and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading states that many claim extinctions of each animal leads to ecological disaster but it is exaggeration. The professor refutes this point by indicating that although author support his attitude by giving an example of dinosaurs, after their extinction we observed dramatic shift in earth surface. Therefore, maintaining of animals means preserving our own life.
Second, the article claims that technologies such as genetic engineering make scientist independent of nature for source of medication. However, the professor contends that it is true that genetic is an important field, but still nature has its own power in medication. The professor mentions that now scientists use 40 percent of plants for medical targets which means 100 species a day. He highlights that extinction of species deprive us from noticeable opportunity.
Third, the reading avers that huge cost spends to support endangered species is often not justified. The lecture opposes this point by saying that fresh water is more important for environment. Unfortunately, 43 percent of fresh water is endangered or already extinct. The professor explains that as they create 10000 jobs and are beneficial for economy, people should try to save them if only for economic purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...xtinction of animals if it is possible. Also he mentions that loss of each species h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52964426877 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86075368346 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9927447132 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9285714286 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152499651287 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531100317174 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374155565987 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922263357805 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342409079076 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.