summarize the points made in the lecture about the turtle excluder device used to protect turtles, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the difficulties mentioned in the reading about turtle excluder device.
The reading discusses the difficulties with a new invention called turtle excluder device for preserving the sea turtles population. However, the professor in lecture disagrees with these satisfactions and gives three reasons to refute each of the statements presented in the reading section respectively.
First, the article states that the number of turtles trapped inside in these excluder devices are so low which can be ignored virtually. But, in the lecture, professor insists that even though the number of turtles got by shrimp hunters' nets are small, there are thousands of boats working in this area and as a result, actually many turtles would be catched each year by those nets. She believes that these two issues must be considered as two generall separate items in order to be compared correctly.
Second, the passage argues about various alternative methods which can be implemented for sea turtles protection like time frames of sea hunting. In contrary, she thinks that this approach is mostly problematic, since there could be less control on boats in alternative methods proposed. Many patrol boats and guards would be needed to manage thousands of fishing boats work during a year.
Third, the reading says that there are some problems with this device when the boats face larger turtles that can not pass the nets easily. On the other hand, professor indicates that these devices can be built in larger dimonsions and they have the ability to be easily modified for numerous situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ading discusses the difficulties with a new invention called turtle excluder device for prese...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'turtles'' or 'turtle's'?
Suggestion: turtles'; turtle's
... excluder device for preserving the sea turtles population. However, the professor in l...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'turtles'' or 'turtle's'?
Suggestion: turtles'; turtle's
...ethods which can be implemented for sea turtles protection like time frames of sea hunt...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21632653061 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57142857143 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4199144841 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237585843599 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943015105829 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664816074365 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143016031604 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356157412171 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.