Do you agree or disagree with the statement that all of the endangered animals should be saved? compare the idea mentioned in a passage with the lecture you listened to.
In the article the author suggests that saving all the endangered animals might not be satisfactory. He mentions three reasons for supporting his idea. However, the expert in the lecture opposes this belief and he thinks it is not correct in all occasions generally.
First, the author discusses the fact that extinction of some species has not changed our life dramatically; so, there is no need to save all the endangered species of animals. In contrast, the lecturer believes that the author forgot to provide the other important elements and facts that extinction of dinasours caused to humans life. He thinks that by extinction of this specie, a huge change happened in the dominant living specie of the world and humans became the main creature of the universe. Thus, if any other extinction occurs, it may cost our generations elimination consequently.
Second, the passage illustrates that with improvements of science and enhancement of technological instruments, we would not need the nature for extracting medication from it as a resource. As, there will be enough advancements in genetics to use this science for our purpose. On the other hand, the professor thinks that although there are many improvements in genetic knowledge of human but it must be mentioned that still near 40 percent of our medicine raw materials came from our nature. Also, we should know that we lose 100 species of plants in nature every day it lasts.
Third, the author thinks there are so many costs related to saving these animals which should be reduced. But, the lecturer believes that there are many economical benefits in some of these animals. For example he mentions one specie which allow the government to create 10000 jobs from its industry. They gain almost 700 million dollar each year from this animal roughly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...e lecturer believes that there are many economical benefits in some of these animals. For ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, third, thus, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07666666667 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69975101733 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5538636659 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.533333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161008457702 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547450194144 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486282272212 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103114010198 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519774413812 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.