summarize the points made in the lecture about problems with living in asteroids, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading about benefits of living in an asteroid.
The reading discusses about the possible benefits of using asteroids for future colonization of humans living on earth. However, the professor in the lecture thinks that this idea might not be so much practical. He opposes with the satisfactions made in the reading and provides three reasons to refute each of the positive factors included in the reading section.
First, the article states that asteroids posses a lower gravity in comparison with other larger planets which can be useful for a safe landing of the spaceship. In contrast, the professor indicates that asteroids with lower gravity have their own certain risks. For example, they may cause people to experience weaker muscle masses and bone density issues that can be seriously dangerous for humans in a long period of time.
Second, the passage explains that these asteroids are often rich in valuable metallic elements which can benefit the habitats of the asteroids. On the other hand, he illustrates that although some of these asteroids have abundant amounts of minerals and metals, their costs and transporting complications might alter their price in the future market that is considered for them. Also, their volume and abundancy can affect their finishing price that can make this industry less profitable for people who want to exploit them.
Third, the reading regards that asteroids have a short distance from our earth and can be easily reached. In contrary, professor reminds that this fact can not be true all the time, since the distance between asteroids and earth change constantly in a periodic manner. Therefore, asteroids which are closer to us now may orbit and position in a farther place in the future which can influence the possibility for reaching them and the feasibility of living on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...eriously dangerous for humans in a long period of time. Second, the passage explains that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 248, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a periodic manner" with adverb for "periodic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n asteroids and earth change constantly in a periodic manner. Therefore, asteroids which are closer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, second, so, therefore, third, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18556701031 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56700340882 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2863419863 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170220939019 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690801224407 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522020650652 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112883997776 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722951938271 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.