Do you agree or disagree with the statement that all of the endangered animals should be saved? compare the idea mentioned in a passage with the lecture you listened to.
In the article the author suggests that saving all the endangered animals might not be satisfactory. He mentions three reasons for supporting his idea. However, the expert in the lecture opposes this belief and he thinks it is not correct in all occasions generally.
First, the author discusses the fact that extinction of some species has not changed our life dramatically; so, there is no need to save all the endangered species of animals. In contrast, the lecturer believes that the author forgot to provide the other important elements and facts that extinction of dinasours caused to humans life. He thinks that by extinction of this specie, a huge change happened in the dominant living specie of the world and humans became the main creature of the universe. Thus, if any other extinction occurs, it may cost our generations elimination consequently.
Second, the passage illustrates that with improvements of science and enhancement of technological instruments, we would not need the nature for extracting medication from it as a resource. As, there will be enough advancements in genetics to use this science for our purpose. On the other hand, the professor thinks that although there are many improvements in genetic knowledge of human but it must be mentioned that still near 40 percent of our medicine raw materials came from our nature. Also, we should know that we lose 100 species of plants in nature every day it lasts.
Third, the author thinks there are so many costs related to saving these animals which should be reduced. But, the lecturer believes that there are many economic benefits in some of these animals. For example he mentions one specie which allow the government to create 10000 jobs from its industry. They gain almost 700 million dollar each year from this animal roughly. Thus, any of these endangered animals worth saving without considering its economic satisfaction in professors opinion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, third, thus, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14240506329 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73025349907 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566455696203 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.155244366 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5625 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171598983698 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568553518066 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477882097864 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108450893424 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526069730193 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.