Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? Interrupt and correct the mistake right away. Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader or Say nothing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is a common incident which has happened for everyone of us that we participate in a class or meeting and the presenter makes a mistake in addressing a number of points. Some people thinks that it is important to remind him about his fault right away. However, some others believe that it would be a good idea to wait until the end of the session and then discuss the issue with the presenter or even ignore the mistake at all. In my view, mentioning the mistake at the moment and correcting it as soon as possible can be so much beneficial for two main reasons.
First, it would prevent and the decrease the chance of further mistakes and misinterpretations. When you talk about a problem with its presenter and rectify it quickly after it was occured, the other attendants can understand the materials correctly before they leave the meeting or classroom. So, it would significantly decrease the probability of making a mistake based on the wrong fact they learned from the class. For example, my friend, Jim, used to go to a psychology meeting where he learned that it is better to confront our bad habits alone without any other persons interferance. He speculated that this can not be entirely right, but, he ignored to discuss it in the class any way. Later, one of his classmates tried to use this method in his life and unfortunately, he confronted with serious issues and when he told about this to his teacher, she mentioned that she did not mean this theory can always be true and it can be implemented only in some occasions. So, as you can see, refusing to change a mistake can lead to damaging situations.
Second, it can improve the quality of the presenter or teacher's course in the future for its next presentations. Teachers usually do some obvious mistakes and repeat them consistently without noticing them, because students rarely have the courage to correct their teacher or professor and this can decline the authenticity of their presentations. On the other hand, if the students notify their mistakes, they can use them for their future classes and improve their content by correcting the problems they do every time.
In conclusion, there are many ways to correct a mistake or scientific error which is occurred in a class normally. It will be so constructive if these mistakes were told to the presenter right at the moment it happens due to its good outcomes that can bring about. Thus, it would be a brilliant idea to pay attention to your teacher and check if his words are logical or not.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73981900452 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73447060649 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518099547511 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0983940093 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.235294118 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179355159735 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629110738481 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329132385814 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115937917225 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227664296943 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.