summarize the points made in the lecture about fire measures, being sure to explain how they address the concerns about forest fires described in the reading.
The article discusses about the fire policy. It mentioned three reseons to show how this policy influenced the environment after a fire. The passage gave three reasons to question the effectiveness of so-called let it burn policy.
First, the man in the reading thinks that this action resulted in destruction of green environment with letting it totally burn out. However, the woman in the lecture completely disagrees with this belief. She feels that after the burning new plants and species have had the chance to growth and thrive while, normally, they had not the opportunity before.
Second, the article believes that the fire had a huge impact on wildlife as it ruined most of the animals’ habitats forever. But, the women states that the place have recovered itself after the fire incident. Also, the population of animals continue to grow incresingly forward. In addition, in the forest by this destruction, the environment have become convenient for some other animals like rabbits and hares to thrive in this area gradually.
Third, the passage indicates that this event caused the tourists to choose other places to visit and this subsequently damaged the economy of the region. on the other hand, in the lecture the expert illustrates that beside the fire, there were other factors like low rain fall and harsh speedy winds which helped to the 1988 fire issue accordingly. Moreover, she thinks that this was a one-time disaster which is never going to happen again and the visitors would definately come back to see the place. As, it gained its old beautiful landscape.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ntly damaged the economy of the region. on the other hand, in the lecture the expe...
^^
Line 13, column 504, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... definately come back to see the place. As, it gained its old beautiful landscape....
^^
Line 13, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it gained its old beautiful landscape.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11832061069 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56395668843 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0979989826 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129065112015 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047764622264 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638309924361 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789741802438 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437879116209 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.