summarize the points in the lecture about genetically modification of trees, explain how they cast doubt on points made in the reading about genetically modified plants.
The article discusses about genetically modification of trees and gives three reasons to support its opinion. However, the professor in the lecture totally disagrees with this agenda and refutes its reasons accordingly.
First, the author thinks that genetic modification can help the trees to become more tough and survive in harsh situations. But, in the lecture, the woman feels that although trees which are genetically modified may resist some events like climate change or similar occasions, on the other hand, in the normal condition some trees survive the difficulties at all. However, if we modify them genetically, we made them to be mostly uniform which can result in all of them extiction, in the case that they cannot resist a unique kind of pest.
Second, the reading mentions that this modification can lead to economical advances for the farmers. In contrary, the woman explains that the farmers have to pay 3 times more for the so-called genetically modified seeds if they wanted to use those seeds. Also, they must buy the seeds again from the sellers every time, since these seeds have not the possibility of being reproduced by planted trees normally.
Third, the article argues the point that humans are using trees and cutting them down so rapidly that their replacement is not feasible. On the other hand, professor reminds that the planted genetically modified trees also cause serious problems for other natural trees in the environment. She points out that the genetically manipulated trees grow radically faster than natural ones and consume nutrients in the soil and water so agressively that nothing is going to remain for other natural trees to survive. So, the artificial trees thenseves do more harm to natural trees than any other factor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all of them extiction, in the case that they cannot resist a unique kind of pest...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18339100346 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57668629615 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581314878893 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.846961993 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.833333333 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185558725032 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694587978873 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448563719133 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109009330406 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018133733116 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.