Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
In the reading section, the writer contends that it would be impossible to maintain a permanent human presence on Venus; however, in the lecture, the professor completely refutes all the reading points by stating that by establishing a permanent station in Venus' atmospher rather than on Venus' surface all the problems will be solved and a permanent human presence would be possible.
First, the writer claims that atmospheric pressure at venus' surface crush all spacecraft that land on Venus; on the other hand, the professor has another point of view and explains that high upon the atmospher, the pressure is low, so the spacecraft would not be crushed by the pressure if it would be located above the Venus' surface.
Second, the writer also maintains that water has to be supplied to Venus from Earth which is impractical; in contrast, the lecture again takes issue with this statement and states that there are chemical composition in the Venus' atmospher which can be used for producing water; therefore, there is no need to supplay water from Earth.
Third, the writer also asserts that very little sunlight reaches the planet's surface which prevent producing electricity to power humans' machines and equipment; in contrast, the professor again is against this opinion and states that a station above the surface would enjoy the sunlight not only which reaches it from the above, but also which would be reflected from below clouds; hence, humans would get enough electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nlight reaches the planets surface which prevent producing electricity to power h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, as to, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53372985075 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 60.0 21.2450331126 282% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3886376419 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 312.75 110.228320801 284% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 60.75 21.698381199 280% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 26.25 7.06452816374 372% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154684455655 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957140477278 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471728806001 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957140477278 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471728806001 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 33.2 13.3589403974 249% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 10.58 53.8541721854 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.7 11.0289183223 242% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.7273730684 256% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.0 10.498013245 248% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 11.2008830022 250% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.