Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the possibility of building a permanent human base on Venus. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author of the reading. He says that it is certainly possible to maintain a presence on Venus.
To begin with, the author argues that the extreme pressure at Venus' surface is one problem of building a human presence. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He says that building a floating basement in the air rather than on the ground is the solution to this problem. This is because the pressure of a higher place is lower, and the pressure of 50 kilometers above the surface is equal to the pressure on earth. Therefore, the environment of Venus will not cause damage to the floating base.
Secondly, the author states that it is hard to maintain a regular supply of water and oxygen on Venus since there is hardly any oxygen or water vapor on the planet's atmosphere. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He believes that there is plenty of carbon dioxide and other chemical matters can be used to make water, which means people can easily obtain enough water on Venus.
Finally, the author claims that the lack of light caused by the thick cloud will prevent the use of solar power cells. The lecturer, on the other hand, feels that the atmosphere level is not that thick, so a lot of sunlight still can be received. Besides, the reflected sunlight can also be used to generate power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...hardly any oxygen or water vapor on the planets atmosphere. This point is challenged by...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64980544747 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36997882875 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529182879377 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.620491421 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3571428571 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959951509461 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445058591454 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572596881174 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615831960314 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465934886875 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.