Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The article and lecture both deal with human life at different planet. Whilst the author of the article thinks this any human’s life will be impossible on Venus for three specific reasons, the lecturer opposes the author’s claim. In his opinion, he said that Venus can be capable of containing human.
First, the writer claims this the pressure on Venus surface is greater than the pressure on earth by 90 times; therefore, these are deadly force for any human will be exist over there so do for any machine. Furthermore, it stated in the article that all spacecraft that had landed on Venus surface, it crashed after landing by one hour. In contrast, the lecture argues that there is a solution for the high pressure. Space station could be built in the sky of Venus by 50 km above the surface. Additionally, the pressure at this height equals the pressure on Earth’s surface.
Second, the author mentions there is not any water on that planet’s surface. On top of that, he adds that water delivery from Earth will be impractical way to keep human on Venus as a permeant stay. However, the lecturer calls this argument into a question by saying that the station can get the water from the atmosphere of Venus because of containing of the elements like nitrogen, carbon and sulfuric acid. Further, he remarks that as the solution for that problem.
Finally, the writer asserts that the thick clouds reduce the sun light that reaches the surface by reflection. In addition to that, in the article it is mentioned that it is going to affect the solar power by preventing using any kind of electricity machine. As opposed to the author, the lecturer holds that as the station will be above the surface by 50 km. it will be above thick clouds. Consequently, the station has the power that it is need it by direct solar light or cloud light reflection. He highlights that permeant human life on Venus could be possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, kind of, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48361980724 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488095238095 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1040538832 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980742929676 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365338701329 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382720420988 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068709040518 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291798681199 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.