Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage.
Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals involve growing trees, because trees can help protect soil and provide many other benefits to fight against desertification. Some scientists have proposed that the best way to grow trees in dry areas in danger of desertification is by using a box-shaped device surrounding the young tree. The device collects water that condenses from vapor in the atmosphere and helps the tree to grow. However, other scientists believe that this device will not be successful in fighting against desertification for the following reasons.

First, at a cost of 25 U S. dollars each, the device would make growing trees a prohibitively expensive process. Meaningful efforts to fight desertification involve growing millions of trees. Some countries most affected by desertification cannot afford to buy devices for millions of trees

Second, plans for fighting desertification involve asking local people to install and maintain the devices. People living in some of the areas most affected by desertification work long days in harsh conditions: sometimes barely managing to provide food for their families. It would be difficult to motivate these people to look after trees that cannot serve as a source of food for them.

Third, the device's ability to collect and conserve water is limited. Each one provides only enough water to keep a small tree alive. Trees that have outgrown the device have to deal with unforgiving environmental conditions on their own. In some places where the devices are being tried, six months can pass without a drop of rain. Once the trees become too big for the device, they may not be able to survive in such a harsh environment.

The author of the reading believes box-shaped devices used to fight against desertification will not be successful from the view of some scientists. The lecturer challenges the author's claim; she says the reason the writer mentioned is unconvincing and worth using to fight against desertification.
First of all, the reading asserts that the device is costly. In some cases, maybe some countries cannot afford the expense. Conversely, the lecturer argues that the cost is not a thing because we can use each device twenty times. After trees have grown, we can remove the device and use it for other trees.
Second, the writer claims that the local people should provide food for their families and maintain devices; it is challenging work. Maybe some people cannot do their daily job according to the maintaining it needs a considerable time. On the contrary, the speaker believes that these devices can help people grow their food, such as vegetables, because devices provide water. Furthermore, after trees are bigger enough for firewood, they can be part of the project.
Finally, the reading asserts that devices' abilities for collecting and conserving water are limited. Another problem is that after the trees have grown, how can they be alive in harsh environments, because in some territories, the drop of rain would not happen. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue because she mentioned that ninety percent of trees had not needed devices after two years in some research in the desert.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, in contrast, such as, first of all, in some cases, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15918367347 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65157258079 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563265306122 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5301355548 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2307692308 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139872540525 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537217278558 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298701445678 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873371254465 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131627013672 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.