Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they illustrtate specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the listening discuss visual-spatial intelligence. The article states that people with it perceive patterns. Besides, the lecture illustrates specific points made in the reading passage. The professor says that it can be seen int he game of chess.
The first point the professor makes is that people have the ability to see the board only a few seconds in a meaningful position. However, if it is put randomly, they are not able to see. This point illustrates specific points made in the reading passage. The latter states that their skills to notice patterns enable them to scratch whatever object they see.
Furthermore, the professor points out about blind people. She explains that those are able to play several games but only get information that they heard and it is pictured in their mind. They need to rely on the ability on they memory. This illustrates the information from the reading. According to the passage individuals work with graphic depictions, 2-D or 3-D.
Finally, the lecture states that blind individuals play each game trying to remember what it was happening in the game and then they try to oversee what it is going to happen next in the game. This point illustrates the reading's key point. According to the article person with visual imagination is able to fathom patterns of mental reasoning which enable him to predict actions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98268398268 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62815845817 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554112554113 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5323944518 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.9375 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4375 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290110136729 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10557271067 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147201687824 0.0662205650399 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181052189511 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730642371583 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.