Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they contradict specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the listening discuss the Pluto as a planet. The article states that there are some definition that a planet should fit on. However, the lecture contradicts specific points made in the reading passage. The professor says that there is another view of Pluto and what members of International Space Station (ISS) who voted controversial was wrong.
The first point the professor makes is that scientists say that Pluto is indeed a planet. He elaborates that Pluto has moons and orbits around the sun. This point contradicts the point made in the reading. The latter states that Pluto meets only two criteria therefore it cannot be considered a planet.
Furthermore, the professor points out that as a definition, Pluto needs to be included as a planet because any large body is included as such then Pluto qualifies to do so. This contradicts the information from the reading. According to the passage Pluto does not enter in the definition.
Finally, the lecture states that calling Pluto as a dwarf planet is confusing. As the speaker has it, for eighty years, saying Pluto is not a planet still confuses students. This point contradicts the redings' key point. According to the article Pluto is a dwarf planet but not a real one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-02 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
| 2016-01-12 | edsonsimoes | 90 | view |
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 75
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 77
- Life experience is a better teacher than school or foreign education Give an example and support opinion 43
- Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general 55
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 16
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90566037736 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65003677507 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1772344973 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.3333333333 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1333333333 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21033318421 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985474728661 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155855809614 0.0662205650399 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145041183432 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594286551017 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.