Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage.
The reading passage gives reasons suggesting that the portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet is not made by Rembrandt. However, the professor in the lecture disagrees with the reasons made in the passage and suggests the following.
Firstly, the passage said that the painting shows inconsistency in the woman’s clothing. She is wearing a simple linen cap of a servant and a luxurious fur collar which is highly unlikely that a servant could afford. The professor opposed this by talking about research to substantiate his opinion. The research conducted an X-ray of the painting which showed that the original painting does not consist of the extravagant fur collar as shown in the portrait and it was added hundred years later by someone else to Rembrandt’s painting to make it more valuable.
Furthermore, the passage mentioned the incongruency in the light and shadow in the portrait and cites that the woman’s face is illuminated by a light reflected on it from below which is highly unlikely as there is a dark-colored fur collar below which absorbs light. The lecturer corrected this reasoning by saying that the fur collar which was painted later on the painting caused this issue and that the original painting of Rembrandt consists of light-colored clothing that reflects the light on the woman’s face.
Lastly, the reading passage mentioned the glued wooden panels which are unlike any of Rembrandt’s works. However, the professor cites that the extra wood pieces were glued to the original wooden panel by someone else to add the fur collar to the painting. Thus, confirming that the portrait is that of Rembrandt. The professor also added that the wood of the original portrait was from the same tree as the wood used by Rembrandt for his other painting - The Self portrait of a hat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... shown in the portrait and it was added hundred years later by someone else to Rembrand...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, lastly, so, thus, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02310231023 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70691507009 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445544554455 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2163323831 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0680763381254 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364884588855 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490374366601 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059206406064 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612821096523 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.