Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response.
The lecturer opposes the reading passage’s opinions on the advantages of university professors’ television appearance to the professors, universities, and the general public.
First of all, the reading passage cites that the professor will gain an enhanced reputation among his colleagues and among the general public as well. The professor doesn’t agree with it and says that the TV appearance of a professor will injure his reputation among academic scholars as they might think that he is not serious about educating and just want to entertain. Because of this, a professor might not get an invitation to important meetings and also, no fundings for his research projects.
Furthermore, the passage says that a professor’s television appearance might benefit the professor’s university in the form of good publicity. This will also help to bring more donations and excellent students to the college but the lecturer doesn’t agree with it and says that the professor might spend a lot of time while preparing for his TV appearance. This way, he would miss out on essential university work, meeting with students, and his research work which are way more important than the TV appearance.
Lastly, the passage suggests that general public could not connect with the professors, so it would be great it they could get the professor’s expertise on an academic topic but the lecturer objects this by saying that people do not usually prefer to view in-depth academic lecture after dinner. Also, the background information provided by the professors on television can be given by TV reports as well.
In conclusion, the lecturer in the conversation does not agree with the reading passage’s view on the issue.
|2022-09-13||nipuntestbig||81||Read full essay|
|2022-07-03||sameep21||73||Read full essay|
|2022-07-01||sameep21||78||Read full essay|
|2021-12-28||AlexanderProust||3||Read full essay|
|2021-09-18||maryam15||80||Read full essay|
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response80
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg the home of SuperCorp s current headquarters Moreover Middle66
- The expression never never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer60
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX
Message: Use simply 'public'.
...o the professors, universities, and the general public. First of all, the reading passage ...
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX
Message: Use simply 'public'.
...tion among his colleagues and among the general public as well. The professor doesn’t agree wi...
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX
Message: Use simply 'public'.
...e. Lastly, the passage suggests that general public could not connect with the professors, ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, lastly, so, well, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29347826087 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95412973355 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.932906236 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.1 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0843581720377 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441220737894 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398899630255 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071365274669 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382378452312 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.